Steroid-using football players are not blamed so harshly, as baseball players

Numerous articles note about intake of steroids in baseball. Sportswriters and journalists describe steroid scandals which occur in this sport. It is frequently debated about steroid era in baseball. MLB players are required to submit to many drug tests. It seems that every individual interested in sports blames baseball players for application of performance-enhancing drugs. Do only baseball players take steroids and other related remedies? What do you think about football players? Don’t they dope? Why do we demonize just baseball players for administration of forbidden medications?
Doping is widespread among football players. Since 1960s administration of performance-enhancing drugs plays an essential role in this sport. It is impossible to imagine football without application of steroids and other related remedies.
Strength and size are substantial features in football. Several people think that football players possess great strength just because of hard trainings and appropriate nutrition. But it is wrong. Numerous football players administer prohibited products in order to gain strength and promote increasing muscle size.
As you see, intake of forbidden medicines is widespread in football. Nevertheless, baseball players are more harshly demonized for administration of steroids and other related medicines. Such baseball players, as Jose Canseco, Roger Clemens and Barry Bonds were subjected to public shame on account of doping. But such football players, as Lyle Alzado, Shawne Merriman, Chris Cooper and Thomas Romanowski, also took prohibited medications. Nevertheless, they were not so widely demonized, as dopers in baseball.
Furthermore, it is important to consider that intake of steroids is more dangerous in football.
It is suggested that football is unlikely to be cleaned from doping.