Debated of sportswriters related to votes for Baseball Hall of Fame

Tom Verducci of Sports Illustrated explains about debates related to rughts of steroid users to be chosen for the Baseball Hall of Fame. But as it usually happens, this explanation manifests only confusion of writers about steroids.
The Baseball Writers Association of America (BWAA)  is a professional association of baseball journalists who chose players for the National Baseball Hall of Fame. All sportswriters who are members of the BWAA already not less than 10 years have right to vote for up to 10 players for the Hall of Fame.
Recently a debate took place between members of the BWAA. They discussed whether admitted or just suspected consumers of steroids and other prohibited drugs might entry into Cooperstown.
Members of the BWAA usually must comment their votes:  they have to explain why they have voted pro or contra certain issues. Some of them claim that doping destroys the integrity of sports and administration of forbidden products is frequently considered by them to be immoral.
As for Tom Verducci, he doesn’t believe that administration of steroids is necessarily a moral question. This sportswriter notes that steroids help users to take unfair advantage over those who don’t dope. According to Tom Verducci, performance-enhancing drugs make competitions unfair. So, intake of banned drugs induces unfairness in sports.  That’s why Tom Verducci denies any connection between doping and morality. This sportswriter confirms that it is a question that is connected with performance but not to morality. So, this sportswriter suggests that steroid users must not be allowed to be in the Hall of Fame. But he has voted for Jeff Bagwell, an admitted steroid user. This sportsperson has admitted that he had administrated androstenedione. It is necessary to notice that this medication was not listed among anabolic steroids, when Bagwell used it. According to the Control Act 2004, it is enumerated among banned preparations. Since it wasn’t legally considered to be a steroid, Tom Verducci decided to vote for the consumer of this medication; however, it was always named an anabolic-androgenic steroid by scientists. Furthermore, it was said that Bagwell just became bigger but didn’t promote his performance due to administration of androstenedione.
Nonetheless, the decision of Verducci to vote for the admitted user of the steroid is quite controversial. The following question appears: “Maybe Verducci is not against intake of steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs by sportspeople?”  Since Verducci doesn’t believe that steroid use is a moral question, he may suggest that enhancement of performance is not a real problem.
A lot of people suggest that intake of steroids represents evil because they are illegal.